MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010250267 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.134108

Thermodynamic pathways to melting, ablation, and solidification in absorbing solids under pulsed laser irradiation

2006· article· en· W2010250267 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick Lorazo, Laurent J. Lewis, Michel Meunier

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser Material Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalPolytechnique MontréalRegroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de Pointe
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceIrradiationSuperheatingIsochoric processThermodynamicsCondensed matter physicsAtomic physicsPhysicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thermodynamic pathways involved in laser irradiation of absorbing solids are investigated in silicon for pulse durations of $500\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{fs}$ and $100\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{ps}$. This is achieved by accounting for carrier and atom dynamics within a combined Monte Carlo and molecular-dynamics scheme and simultaneously tracking the time evolution of the irradiated material in $\ensuremath{\rho}\text{\ensuremath{-}}T\text{\ensuremath{-}}P$ space. Our simulations reveal thermal changes in long-range order and state of aggregation driven, in most cases, by nonequilibrium states of rapidly heated or promptly cooled matter. Under femtosecond irradiation near the ablation threshold, the system is originally pulled to a near-critical state following rapid $(\ensuremath{\lesssim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}12}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{s})$ disordering of the mechanically unstable crystal and isochoric heating of the resulting metallic liquid. The latter is then adiabatically cooled to the liquid-vapor regime where phase explosion of the subcritical, superheated melt is initiated by a direct conversion of translational, mechanical energy into surface energy on a $\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}12}--{10}^{\ensuremath{-}11}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{s}$ time scale. At higher fluences, matter removal involves, instead, the fragmentation of an initially homogeneous fluid subjected to large strain rates upon rapid, supercritical expansion in vacuum. Under picosecond irradiation, homogeneous and, at later times, heterogeneous melting of the superheated solid are followed by nonisochoric heating of the molten metal. In this case, the subcritical liquid material is subsequently cooled onto the binodal by thermal conduction and explosive boiling does not take place; as a result, ablation is associated with a ``trivial'' fragmentation process, i.e., the relatively slow expansion and dissociation into liquid droplets of supercritical matter near thermodynamic equilibrium. This implies a liquid-vapor equilibration time of $\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}11}--{10}^{\ensuremath{-}10}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{s}$ and heating along the binodal under nanosecond irradiation. Solidification of the nonablated, supercooled molten material is eventually observed on a $\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}11}--{10}^{\ensuremath{-}9}\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{s}$ time scale, irrespective of the pulse duration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations330
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicLaser Material Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207