Prediction of Scoliosis Progression in Time Series Using a Hybrid Learning Technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scoliosis is a common and poorly understood spinal disorder that is clinically monitored with a series of full spinal X-rays. The purpose of this study was to predict scoliosis future progression at 6- and 12-month intervals with successive spinal indices and a hybrid learning technique (i.e., the combination of fuzzy c-means clustering and artificial neural network (ANN)). Ultimately this could decrease scoliotic patients' radiation exposure and the associated cancer risk in growing adolescents. Seventy-two data sets were derived from a database of 56 acquisitions from 11 subjects (29.8 +/- 9.6 degrees Cobb angle, 11.4 +/- 2.4 yr), each consisting of 4 sequential values of Cobb angle and lateral deviations at apices in 6- and 12-month intervals in the coronal plane. Progression patterns in Cobb angles (n = 10) and lateral deviations (n = 8) were successfully identified using a fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm. The accuracies of the trained ANN, having a structure of three input variables, four nonlinear hidden nodes, and one linear output variable, for training and test data sets were within 3.64 degrees (+/- 2.58 degrees) and 4.40 degrees (+/- 1.86 degrees) of Cobb angles, and within 3.59 (+/-3.96) mm and 3.98 (+/- 3.41) mm of lateral deviations, respectively. Those results were twice the accuracy of typical clinical measurement (~10 degrees) and in close agreement with those using cubic spline extrapolation and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) techniques. The adapted technique for predicting the scoliosis deformity progression holds significant promise for clinical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".