La reconnaissance de l'eau comme patrimoine commun : quels enjeux pour l'analyse économique ?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis les années 1970, deux mouvements animent les politiques de l’eau à l’échelle internationale et ont des répercussions à l’échelle locale : la "marchandisation" et la "patrimonialisation". Cet article analyse les bouleversements théoriques engendrés par la reconnaissance de l’eau comme patrimoine commun. Dans ce cadre, nous revenons tout d’abord sur le courant des ressources communes (Common Pool Resources) et sur l’un de ses prolongements : la médiation patrimoniale par récurrence. Puis, nous présentons les principaux enseignements de l’économie du patrimoine. Ces différentes approches sont discutées et mobilisées pour analyser des institutions traditionnelles et modernes de gestion de l’eau, en France et au Maghreb.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it