Effet d'anamorphose d'une prescription ministérielle en formation professionnelle au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au sein d’un cadre théorique de sociologie de l’action publique, les auteurs analysent l’implantation d’un instrument de politique éducative auprès de 17 directeurs de centre de formation professionnelle (CFP) montréalais, interrogés lors d’entretiens semi-directifs. Le Ministère de l’éducation du Québec demande que le nombre des jeunes de moins de 20 ans augmente en FP : cette prescription se déploie dans un contexte de nouvelle gouvernance où les responsables locaux sont redevables de leurs actions en termes d’amélioration d’indicateurs statistiques. L’analyse se concentre sur la manière dont la prescription perturbe les représentations collectives. La focalisation statistique sur la question des jeunes tend à bouleverser l’image positive qui s’était progressivement construite dans le milieu. Le déplacement de regard produit un effet d’anamorphose contribuant à montrer ce qui se cachait et à rendre flou le tableau d’ensemble d’un secteur de formation luttant depuis longtemps pour une reconnaissance de sa valeur et de sa fonction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".