MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010341193 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2006.885977

A New Current-Mode Incremental Signaling Scheme With Applications to Gb/s Parallel Links

2007· article· en· W2010341193 on OpenAlexaff
Tao Wang, Fei Yuan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Fundamental Theory and Applications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransimpedance amplifierElectronic engineeringCMOSBandwidth (computing)Computer scienceAmplifierIntegratorTopology (electrical circuits)Electrical engineeringEngineeringOperational amplifierTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<para xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> A new current-mode incremental signaling (CMIS) scheme and a new fully differential current-integrating receiver for high-speed parallel links are presented. The proposed signaling scheme requires only <formula formulatype="inline"> <tex>$N+1$</tex></formula> physical paths for <formula formulatype="inline"> <tex>$N$</tex></formula> parallel bits. It possesses the intrinsic advantages of current-mode signaling including high data rates, large signal swing, low switching noise injection, and superior signal integrity. The current-integrating receiver consisting of a transimpedance front-end, an integrator, and a sense amplifier with active inductor shunt peaking offers the key advantages of a low and tunable input impedance for channel termination, large bandwidth, and effective suppression of transient noise coupled to the channels. To assess the effectiveness of the proposed signaling scheme and the current-integrating receiver, a 4-bit parallel link consisting of four bipolar current-mode drivers, five 10-cm microstrip lines with FR4 substrate, and four proposed current-integrating receivers is implemented in UMC 0.13-<formula formulatype="inline"><tex>$\mu{\hbox {m}}$</tex></formula> 1.2-V CMOS technology and analyzed using <emphasis emphasistype="italic">SpectreRF</emphasis> from Cadence Design Systems with BSIM3.3V device models. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed CMIS scheme and the current-integrating receiver are capable of transmitting parallel data at 2.5 GB/s. </para>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.880

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Fundamental Theory and ApplicationsSame topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207