Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a widespread and destructive disease of barley (Hordeum vulgare) in China. Extensive research on FHB of barley has been conducted in China over the past 50 years, but most of the research publications are written in Chinese and are not accessible to readers outside China. At least 16 Fusarium species pathogenic to barley have been identified in China, with F. graminearum (teleomorph Gibberella zeae) considered the primary cause of FHB. Severe FHB epidemics have occurred since 1952, particularly in regions in the lower and middle reaches of the Yangtze River. The mycotoxins deoxynivalenol, nivalenol, zearalenone, T-2, and fumonisin have been associated with FHB epidemics in barley, and many cases of mycotoxicosis have been reported. An integrated management strategy has been employed to mitigate FHB. Six-row cultivars have mostly been replaced by two-row cultivars in southern China. New barley cultivars are generally short in stature, mature early, and have the potential to withstand rainstorms in early spring. Barley accessions with different levels of resistance to FHB have been identified and used in barley breeding programs in China and elsewhere in the world. Forecasting models with high levels of accuracy have been used for decades to assess the risk of FHB epidemics. Application of fungicides is recommended as a control measure when necessary. Also recommended are cultural practices to reduce the risk of FHB epidemics. If all these control measures fail, decontamination methods that have been developed are employed to save Fusarium -infected barley kernels for use as feed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".