MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010376489 · doi:10.3138/md.52.1.19

<i>richardthesecond</i>: Adapting Shakespeare to the Local in a Culture of Global Celebrity

2009· article· en· W2010376489 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Robert Ormsby

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Drama · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopular cultureMultinational corporationPropositionMedia studiesFluencySociologyCivilizationMedia cultureIdentity (music)sortAestheticsPolitical scienceArtLawEpistemologyPhilosophyComputer scienceLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay discusses how Matthew MacFadzean's richardthesecond adapts Shakespeare's Richard II to both popular American (or global) culture and local (Canadian) points of orientation. MacFadzean's solo multimedia performance treats sceptically both the notion that Shakespeare can be used as a high-culture defence against popular culture and Marshall McLuhan's proposition that Canada is an anti-environment that renders visible the United States' global environment. Instead, richardthesecond aligns culturally conservative views of Shakespeare with multinational corporate greed and implies that Canada cannot form a national identity that is wholly distinct from that of the United States. The play requires of its audience a sort of “triple vision,” or a fluency in Shakespeare and popular culture as well as a detailed understanding of Canadian culture. Ultimately, the demands that MacFadzean makes on his audience not only demonstrate the interpenetration of the global and the local but also expose the heterogeneity of local theatre communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern DramaSame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207