MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010383964 · doi:10.1021/om050764t

Bifunctional Perfluoroaryl Boranes:  Synthesis and Coordination Chemistry with Neutral Lewis Base Donors

2005· article· en· W2010383964 on OpenAlexaff
P.A. Chase, Lee D. Henderson, Warren E. Piers, Masood Parvez, W. Clegg, M.R.J. Elsegood

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganometallics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganoboron and organosilicon chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryLewis acids and basesBoranesAdductBifunctionalDiboraneFrustrated Lewis pairSteric effectsElectrophileMedicinal chemistryStereochemistrySolid-stateCoordination complexOrganic chemistryBoronCatalysisPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A practical synthetic route for the preparation of the known bifunctional perfluoroaryldiborane C 6 F 4 -1,2-[B(C 6 F 5 ) 2 ] 2, 1, and the new diborane C 6 F 4 -1,2-[B(C 12 F 8 )] 2, 2, that circumvents the use of toxic mercury reagents has been developed. Key intermediates and 2 have been fully characterized in solution and the solid state. Solution and structural investigations of their MeCN and THF adducts have shown that 2 is a superior Lewis acid to 1, primarily owing to the reduction in steric pressure afforded by the planar 9-borafluorene rings in 2 versus the freely rotating set of pentafluorophenyl rings in 1 . The two compounds bind Lewis bases via differing coordination modes, as demonstrated by the solid-state structures of the Lewis base adducts 1·MeCN, 2·THF, and 2·MeCN . Solution studies suggest that bis Lewis base adducts are also accessible; the structures of two examples ( 1· ( MeCN ) 2 and 2· ( THF ) 2 ) have been determined, and their role in the dynamic solution behavior of these systems is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations96
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganometallicsSame topicOrganoboron and organosilicon chemistryFrench-language works237,207