Computational approaches to discovering noncoding RNA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New developments are being brought to the field of molecular biology with the mounting evidence that RNA transcripts not translated into protein (noncoding RNAs, ncRNAs) hold a variety of biological functions. Computational discovery of ncRNAs is one of these developments, fueled not only by the urge to characterize these sequences but also by necessity to prioritize ones with the most relevant functions for experimental verification. The heterogeneity in size and mode of activity of ncRNAs is reflected in the corresponding diversity of computational methods for their study. Sequence and structural analysis, conservation across species, and relative position to other genomic elements are being used for ncRNA detection. In addition, the recent development of techniques that allow deep sequencing of cell transcripts either globally or from isolated ncRNA-related material is leading the field toward increased use of such high-throughput data. We expect that imminent breakthroughs will include the classification of newer types of ncRNA and new insights into miRNA and piRNA biology, eventually leading toward the completion of a catalog of all human ncRNAs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it