Tear into the Guts: Whitman, Steinbeck, Springsteen, and the Durability of Lost Souls on the Road
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article investigates the relationship between the concepts of freedom and confinement and the metaphor of “the road” in the works of three significant American cultural figures. A close analysis of the formal elements of the poetry of Walt Whitman, the novels of John Steinbeck, and the songs of Bruce Springsteen reveals a negation at the core of durability. These narratives pit characters, readers, and listeners against the ideology of freedom that structures road narratives and American durability. Whitman’s version of the road is open and apparently available to all, whereas Steinbeck’s version inverts these terms, making the road a place of oppression and confinement. Beginning to unveil these contradictions, Springsteen’s music grasps the weight and emptiness of the road as a cultural signifier. Finally, the article argues that only through collective thought and action within and against the contradictions inherent in durability can we stop simply persisting and start living. Le présent article étudie la relation entre les concepts de liberté et le confinement et la métaphore de « la route » dans les oeuvres de trois personnalités culturelles américaines. Une analyse approfondie des éléments formels de la poésie de Walt Whitman, des romans de John Steinbeck et des chansons de Bruce Springsteen révèlent une négation au coeur de la durabilité. Ces narratifs dressent les personnages, les lecteurs, et les auditeurs contre l’idéologie de la liberté qui forme la structure des narratifs des routes et la durabilité américaine. La version de Whitman en ce qui a trait à la route est ouverte et apparemment accessible à tous, tandis que celle de Steinbeck inverse ces termes, faisant de la route un endroit où règnent l’oppression et le confinement. En commençant à dévoiler ces contradictions, la musique de Springsteen saisit le poids et le vide de la route comme un signifiant culturel. Enfin, cet article préconise que seulement par le truchement de l’action et de la pensée collective dans et contre les contradictions inhérentes à la durabilité pouvons-nous arrêter de simplement subsister et commencer à vivre.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.024 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".