Le régime québécois d'indemnisation des victimes d'accidents de la route est-il un exemple à suivre pour le droit français ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'indemnisation du dommage corporel résultant des accidents de la route gagne de son autonomie au regard du droit de la responsabilité civile. Le droit français laisse pourtant subsister des hypothèses de prise en compte de la faute, et notamment de celle du conducteur. L'exemple du régime québécois, l'un des plus aboutis des régimes sans égard à la faute, offre l'avantage de distinguer la sanction de la faute de la réparation des préjudices. La Société d'assurance automobile, créée en 1979, s'est vue confier le monopole de l'indemnisation du dommage corporel des victimes, ainsi que le soin de participer à leur réinsertion sociale et la prévention des accidents de la route. Parfois critiqué pour l'indemnisation des victimes ayant commis les infractions les plus graves, le système est tout de même largement accepté et permet une maîtrise des coûts par la rationalisation de la gestion et la quasi disparition du contentieux.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".