MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Osteoblast Nodule Formation and Mineralisation on Foamed 58S Bioactive Glass

2003· article· en· W2010441272 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKey engineering materials · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsKensington Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNodule (geology)Bioactive glassOsteoblastMaterials scienceChemical engineeringNuclear chemistryMineralogyComposite materialFood scienceChemistryGeologyEngineeringBiochemistryIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study the authors analyzed human osteoblast responses to a porous bioactive glass scaffold. Attachment, spreading and formation of mineralized nodules in response to culture on the bioactive glass were analyzed. Dissoln. products are a key feature of bioactive glasses and these were measured by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy to det. effects of both the glass surface and ion release. Osteoblasts attached and proliferated on the foams as demonstrated by SEM. Nodule formation was also obsd. in the pores of the glass and also in conditioned medium contg. dissoln. products at certain concns. and these nodules were shown to be mineralized by alizarin red staining. [on SciFinder (R)]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it