Bibliographic record
Abstract
Facteur économique important, le tourisme joue un rôle déterminant pour l’Île aux Grues. Cet article rend compte du potentiel touristique que l’île tire de sa situation géographique particulière. Peut-on y observer une manière de pratiquer un tourisme culturel qui soit du domaine propre à l’insularité ? Comment les manifestations de la mi-carême et de la traversée en canot à glace entrent-elles en jeu dans la construction du tourisme culturel ? La promotion touristique fait-elle également place aux personnalités publiques comme le peintre Jean-Paul Riopelle, qui s’était établi dans le manoir de l’île ? L’auteur examine également l’impact du tourisme insulaire, tant sur les résidents de l’île que sur le touriste. S’appuyant sur des témoignages, il tente ainsi de mieux comprendre les implications que soulève la mise en marché d’un tourisme de masse dans un milieu restreint, sans pour autant sacrifier le quotidien de l’île pour plaire à tout prix.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".