MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010471950 · doi:10.1080/00150190902876207

Effects of Sintering Temperature on the Relaxor Behavior of 0.85BaTiO<sub>3</sub>-0.15BiAlO<sub>3</sub>Solid Solution

2009· article· en· W2010471950 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueFerroelectrics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceSinteringSolid solutionThermodynamicsComposite materialMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Typical relaxor behavior was observed in lead-free 0.85BaTiO 3 -0.15BiAlO 3 solid solution, which was found to depend on the sintering temperature of the ceramics. With the sintering temperature decreased from 1350°C to 1250°C, the relaxor behavior is enhanced while the temperature of the dielectric maximum (T m ) decreases. The decrease of sintering temperature also results in an increase in the degree of deviation from the Curie-Weiss law. The frequency dependence of the temperature T m fits well to the Vogel–Fulcher law. Ferroelectric hysteresis loops displayed at room temperature show that the remnant polarizations (P r ) decreases as the sintering temperature decreases. Keywords: Relaxor behaviorsintering temperature(1-x)BaTiO3−xBiAlO3 solid solution Acknowledgments This work was supported by the U. S. Office of Naval Research (Grant No. N00014-06-1-0166) and the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it