La néoruralité au Québec : facteur présentiel d’enrichissement collectif ou source d’embourgeoisement ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this paper is twofold. First, drawing on the work undertaken on components of local economies based on externally generated residential development, we seek to examine how the presence of neo-ruralites has revitalized the economy of the village of Saint-Mathieu-de-Rioux, a rural municipality in Quebec undergoing a process of neoruralisation. Second, we seek to determine the sustainability of the strategy based on attracting such residential development to enhance the territorial development of Saint-Mathieu-de-Rioux, particularly in terms of the community?s attractiveness, which has been both a source of population growth and recreational and touristic visitation. The interest of this case study is based on the fact that it focuses on the effect of neorurality, one source of population growth, in a peripheral municipality considered for long as a "losing" community, at least according to the criteria Benko G. and Lipietz A. (1992) used to identify the conditions for "winning" regions. Research shows that the presence of special attractions within the territory of Saint-Mathieu-de-Rioux and their development has contributed to the attraction of new populations. The impacts of this neorurality are varied: improvement of infrastructure and buildings, increasing land values, general beautification, and revitalization of village governance and social and community life. These elements undoubtedly have contributed to the attractiveness of the territory. This makes it a "winning" territory. But a number of negative effects have also been identified, particularly in relation to the environment and social cohesion. In fact, the neorurality observed in Saint-Mathieu-de-Rioux seems more like a process of village gentrification rather than new economic development consequent on the presence of new populations as has been observed in a number of other local economies. Moreover, environmental deterioration resulting from neorurality has already begun to affect the attractiveness of the village. Thus, in the case studied, it appears that the strategy of local development through the establishment of productive systems cannot be completely replaced by a strategy aimed at attracting new populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".