MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010482300 · doi:10.1109/82.996053

The design of hybrid carry-lookahead/carry-select adders

2002· article· en· W2010482300 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II Analog and Digital Signal Processing · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdderCarry (investment)Computer scienceCarry-save adderPath (computing)ArithmeticSerial binary adderGenerator (circuit theory)Critical path methodComputer hardwareParallel computingPower (physics)MathematicsEngineeringTelecommunicationsComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a general architecture for designing hybrid carry-lookahead/carry-select adders. Several previous adders in the literature are all special cases of this general architecture. They differ in the way Boolean functions for the carries are implemented. Based on the general architecture, we propose a new implementation of high-speed 56-bit hybrid adder. The new adder directly implements group carry propagates and group carry generators without individual carry generator/propagate signals. Moreover, the group carry generator/propagate signals are complemented to gain speed. The new implementation can be in static CMOS or dynamic logic style. The critical path length of our new design is about 2/3 of the critical path lengths of previous adders; therefore, higher speed can be gained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.851

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it