MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Broadening effects and ergodicity in deep level photo-thermal spectroscopy of defect states in semi-insulating GaAs: A combined temperature-, pulse-rate- and time-domain study of defect state kinetics

2010· article· en· W2010490727 on OpenAlexafffund
Andreas Mandelis, Jun Xia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsErgodicityMaterials scienceExponential functionExponential distributionGaussianDoppler broadeningThermalMolecular physicsSpectroscopyErgodic theoryTime evolutionPulse (music)Computational physicsAtomic physicsChemistryOpticsSpectral linePhysicsThermodynamicsMathematicsQuantum mechanicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The technique of Deep Level Photo-Thermal Spectroscopy (DLPTS) is extended to the low temperature region in order to cover several defect states in semi-insulating GaAs. Measurements are taken at three different modes, temperature-scanned, pulse-rate-scanned, and time-scanned DLPTS. It is demonstrated that each mode provides unique information about the defect configuration, and the combination of the different modes offers a powerful tool for DLPTS studies of physical optoelectronic processes in SI-GaAs. The non-exponentiality/broadening of experimental data is extensively studied using the two prevalent broadening theories: the stretched exponential and the Gaussian distribution of activation energies. A hierarchical carrier emission model has been proposed for the stretched exponential behavior. Simulations indicate that the two broadening theories exhibit roughly similar broadening effects and good fits to the experimental data. The origin of this similarity indicates an ergodic equivalence of random energy distribution and the constrained hierarchical emission process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicThermography and Photoacoustic TechniquesFrench-language works237,207