Bibliographic record
Abstract
Howard Barker's play The Bite of the Night has rarely been performed and is not often studied, but its technique offers a valuable model whereby to analyse his subsequent work. Scenes of violence starkly enacted become focal points for an action that at all other times seems to spin out of control. Through this bizarre method, the play demonstrates the value of an artwork that resembles Helen of Troy – beautiful, desirable, and productive of violence. Through Savage's interaction with Helen, Barker speculates that the purely aesthetic and therefore inviolable core of her person provides the foundation for ethical interaction with a society that threatens to segment humanity through its institutions and desires. Helen exposes Savage's need for what Jacques Lacan terms l'objet petit a, and through her beauty, teaches him to fulfil and thus destroy all of his yearnings, exposing what he lacks in order to discover who he is. The play itself serves a similar purpose for its audience, revealing the “miracle” that “happen[s] when desire's dead” (Bite of the Night 78).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".