MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W201050529

Энеолитический комплекс многослойного поселения Курья 1

2010· article· ru· W201050529 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Волков Евгений Николаевич

Bibliographic record

VenueVestnik arheologii, antropologii i ètnografii · 2010
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPotteryChronologyTaigaSettlement (finance)ArchaeologyGeographyTypologyQuarter (Canadian coin)SteppeHistoryForestry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present article is devoted to investigation results regarding materials on the Bajryk and Lybayevo culture of Kurja 1 multilayer settlement in the sub-taiga Low Tobol basin. During investigation of the site it was determined that the settlement territory was opened up by the Bajryk and Lybayevo communities twice: in the early III millennium B.C. and in the middle last quarter of III millennium B.C. A hetero-temporal nature of the complexes is testified by data of relative chronology, typology of pottery collections and certain features of stone industry. The available materials enable to conclude that specificity of the «sub-taiga» cultural sites generally copied processes typical for the Bajryk and Lybayevo antiquities of the forest and steppe zone. Archaeological materials make it possible to assume a leading role of hunting in economy of the cultures bearers, with a subordinated role of fishing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVestnik arheologii, antropologii i ètnografiiSame topicAncient and Medieval Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207