MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010540310 · doi:10.3406/amime.2006.1591

Châlucet (Haute-Vienne) : organisation de l’habitat castral et expressions du pouvoir

2006· article· en· W2010540310 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christian Rémy, Patrice Conte, Sandrine Conan

Bibliographic record

VenueArchéologie du Midi médiéval · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Architecture and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVernacularQuarter (Canadian coin)HumanitiesArtArchaeologyGeographyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The site of Châlucet (Saint-Jean-Ligoure, Haute-Vienne) occupies the crest and flanks of the point of a confluence. Over more than 500 meters in length, it presents the remains of two castral entities: the lower Châlucet, ancient castrum organized as a co-seigneury, has the form of an agglomeration of knights whose dwellings are concentrated in a half-hectare enclosure flanked by suburbs. Excavations conducted since 1998 have revealed several of these castral houses. The high Châlucet appears to have been an ensemble of the same type until 1270 when a new castle was implanted in its centre. Its constructer was a close counsellor to the kings of France, Géraud de Maulmont, and his fortified palace thus appears totally incoherent with the vernacular castral culture characterized by a strong degree of fragmentation of powers within the castra. Consequently, Châlucet juxtaposes two castral conceptions, one having preserved its vernacular dispositions, as they still functioned during the 13th to 15th centuries, the other introducing— during the last quarter of the 13th century— the notion of prestigious architecture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchéologie du Midi médiévalSame topicMedieval Architecture and ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207