MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010542688 · doi:10.7202/030851ar

The Impact of British Military Spending on the Colonial American Money Markets, 1760‑1783

2006· article· fr· W2010542688 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Julian Gwyn

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Papers · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La majorité des dépenses du gouvernement britannique en Amérique du Nord pendant la période 1740-1783 fut absorbée par l'armée. Les sommes dépensées furent d'une telle importance qu'elles affectèrent le taux de change de la monnaie de même que l'ensemble du commerce qui s'effectuait dans les villes coloniales. Les principaux banquiers impliqués dans le système furent les entrepreneurs travaillant à la solde du gouvernement pour distribuer les vivres et les salaires de l'armée. L'auteur s'attarde ici au rôle qu'a joué la famille Drummond et ses partenaires alors qu'ils détenaient ces contrats entre 1767 et 1783; il élabore également sur l'impact que ce système a exercé sur quelques-unes des villes coloniales, en particulier, celles de New York, Halifax et Québec; enfin, à la lumière de sa documentation, il pose un regard nouveau sur ce qui a été communément appelé à l'époque « l'affaire du Canada ».

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.387
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorical PapersSame topicHistorical Economic and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207