MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010546828 · doi:10.1145/2463372.2463538

Evolutionary multiobjective optimization for selecting members of an ensemble streamflow forecasting model

2013· article· en· W2010546828 on OpenAlexafffund
D. Brochero, Christian Gagné, François Anctil

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater resources management and optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMulti-objective optimizationSortingComputer scienceProbabilistic logicSelection (genetic algorithm)Evolutionary algorithmMathematical optimizationPareto principleGenetic algorithmFlexibility (engineering)Process (computing)Genetic programmingReliability (semiconductor)Artificial intelligenceMachine learningMathematicsAlgorithmStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are proposing to use the Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) for optimizing a hydrological forecasting model of 800 simultaneous streamflow predictors. The optimization is based on the selection of the best 48 predictors from the 800 that jointly define the "best" ensemble in terms of two probabilistic criteria. Results showed that the difficulties in simplifying the ensembles mainly originate from the preservation of the system reliability. We conclude that Pareto fronts generated with NSGA-II allow the development of a decision process based explicitly on the trade-off between different probabilistic properties. In other words, evolutionary multiobjective optimization offers more flexibility to the operational hydrologists than a priori methods that produce only one selection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.451
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWater resources management and optimizationFrench-language works237,207