MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010569772 · doi:10.1038/sj.jim.7000150

Enzyme treatment to reduce solids and improve settling of sewage sludge

2001· article· en· W2010569772 on OpenAlexaff
Nagina Parmar, Ajay Singh, O. P. Ward

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCellulaseLipaseSettlingProteaseChemistrySewage sludgeEnzymeFood scienceSuspended solidsSewage treatmentActivated sludgeChromatographyPulp and paper industryWastewaterBiochemistryEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of microbial enzymes in reducing the disposable solid content of sludge was investigated. A mixture of industrial cellulase, protease, and lipase, in equal proportion by weight, reduced total suspended solids (TSS) by 30-50% and improved settling of solids. An increase in solid reduction was observed with increasing enzyme concentration. The effect of combinations of enzyme treatments indicated that two-enzyme combinations of protease and cellulase produced better solid reduction than individual enzymes and that lipase further augmented this effect. Among the individual enzymes, protease produced a more settleable sludge as compared to cellulase and lipase. Adjustment of the pH of the enzymatically treated sludge to the acidic range (pH 2-4) further improved solid reduction, and adjustment to the alkaline range (pH 10-12) improved settleability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Industrial Microbiology & BiotechnologySame topicBiofuel production and bioconversionFrench-language works237,207