MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010589874 · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.012702

VUV fluorescence following electron-impact dissociative excitation of CS<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2011· article· lv· W2010589874 on OpenAlexafffund
Stephen J. Brotton, J W McConkey

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2011
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Molecular Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsAtomic physicsElectron ionizationExcitationSpectral lineElectronEmission spectrumFragmentation (computing)Dissociation (chemistry)IonizationNuclear physicsIonChemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electron-impact dissociation of CS${}_{2}$ has been studied by observation of the atomic spectral emission features in the range 115--170 nm. Absolute photoemission cross sections are presented over the complete wavelength range for an incident electron energy of 100 eV. As an example, the measured cross section of the strong C i emission at 165.7 nm, which is a prominent feature in many solar and other extraterrestrial spectra, is ($1.45\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.19)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}18}$ cm${}^{2}$. Comparison with earlier cross-sectional measurements suggest that these were too high by a factor of more than three. Excitation functions of the dominant C i (156.1 nm) and S i (147.4 nm) emission lines have been measured for electron-impact energies from threshold to 360 eV. From appearance energy measurements in the near-threshold region, likely fragmentation channels are identified which involve both two-fragment breakup and total fragmentation of the parent CS${}_{2}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicAtomic and Molecular PhysicsFrench-language works237,207