MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010601647 · doi:10.2164/jandrol.108.006171

Effect of Testosterone on Epithelial Cell Proliferation in the Regressed Rat Epididymis

2009· article· en· W2010601647 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Andrology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityWilliam Osler Health System
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpididymisTestosterone (patch)AndrogenEndocrinologyInternal medicineBiologyCell growthAndrologyMedicineSpermHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is well established that testosterone plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of epididymal structure and function. However, the role of testosterone in restoring the cellular architecture of the regressed epididymis is not well known. The present study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that testosterone triggers the regressed epididymis by re-expanding existing cells and inducing cell proliferation. Testosterone-dependent epididymal morphology was evaluated in orchidectomized, regressed rats after initiation of treatment with testosterone. Besides that, the proliferative activity of epithelial cells in all regions of the epididymis of the orchidectomized, regressed rats was assessed at 1, 3, 7, and 28 days after testosterone replacement. Epithelial cell proliferation decreased after testosterone withdrawal and increased following testosterone administration. We found that bromodeoxyuridine incorporation and proliferating nuclear antigen expression increased significantly 3 days after testosterone replacement in all regions of the regressed epididymis except in the initial segment. The highest mitotic activity was seen in the corpus epididymidis at 3 days postimplantation. Using specific markers for each cell type, we found no significant changes in the proportion of each cell type compared with the control. We observed labeled nuclei in all epithelial cell types in the control; however, principal cells were the major cell types that responded to testosterone after regression. These observations demonstrate that the mammalian epididymis is not a static tissue without any significant cell renewal, either under control conditions or when androgen exposure is altered, thus providing new insight in the role of androgen in restoration and maintenance of the architecture of the epididymis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it