Formation of unusual molecular rectangles and squares containing low spin and high spin Co(ii) and Fe(ii) centers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ditopic carbohydrazide and thiocarbohydrazide based ligands H₂L1 and H₂L2 react with Co(II)(OAc)₂ to produce the homoleptic Co(II) molecular rectangles 1 and 2, containing either a mixture of high spin and low spin Co(II) sites or exclusively low spin Co(II) centers, respectively, with two mono-deprotonated ligands in a syn-conformation, and the other two doubly-deprotonated ligands in an anti-arrangement. The Co(II) centers are bridged by μ-O/S and μ-N-N groups, respectively. Magnetic susceptibility measurements indicate weak antiferromagnetic coupling between metal centers in 1 and 2, with room temperature magnetic moments of 6.6 and 3.4 μ(B), respectively, in good agreement with two S = 3/2 and two S = 1/2 centers for 1 and four S = 1/2 centers for 2. Reaction of H₂L1 and H₂L2 with Fe(II)(CF₃SO₃)₂ in the presence of a base leads to the formation of μ-O/S bridged homoleptic molecular squares 3 and 4, with the Fe(II) centers in high spin and low spin configurations, respectively at room temperature, as indicated from X-ray structural data and magnetic susceptibility measurements. However, in 3 one Fe(II) site undergoes spin crossover to a low spin state at about 150 K, while 4 stays diamagnetic in the full 2-300 K temperature range. Electrochemistry of 4 showed four distinct reversible red-ox waves associated with step-by-step one electron processes in the molecular square [-0.643 (ΔE(p) = 81 mV), -0.278 (ΔE(p) = 70 mV), +0.565 (ΔE(p) = 65 mV), ~1.1 V], associated with the Fe(II)/Fe(III) red-ox couples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".