MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010607083 · doi:10.1089/met.2008.0071

Metabolic Syndrome and the Burden of Cardiovascular Disease in Caribbean Hispanic Women Living in Northern Manhattan: A Red Flag for Education

2009· article· en· W2010607083 on OpenAlexaff
Stella Yala, Elaine Fleck, Robert R. Sciacca, Darlene Castro, Zena Joseph, Elsa‐Grace V. Giardina

Bibliographic record

VenueMetabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Canadian institutionsColumbia College
FundersU.S. Public Health ServiceAvon Foundation for WomenU.S. Department of Health and Human Services
KeywordsMedicineMetabolic syndromeNational Cholesterol Education ProgramDemographyResidenceEthnic groupGerontologyWaistSocioeconomic statusBody mass indexLogistic regressionInternal medicineObesityPopulationEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome has the highest prevalence among Mexican-American women. Little information is available for Caribbean Hispanics, the largest and fastest growing ethnic minority in the United States. We sought to evaluate the frequency of metabolic syndrome and its relationship with race/ethnicity, socioeconomic position, and education in women of largely Caribbean Hispanic origin. METHODS: There were 204 women enrolled in a cross-sectional study who had demographics, fasting glucose, lipid profile, waist circumference, and blood pressure determined. Metabolic syndrome (defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program/Adult Treatment Panel III [NCEP/ATP III]) was analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression to test age, race/ethnicity, education, health insurance, and residence on the risk of metabolic syndrome. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Mean age was 58 +/- 11 years, Hispanic 44.1% (93% Caribbean), non-Hispanic white (NHW) 38.7%, and non-Hispanic black 9.8%. Education was some high school (<HS) 33.7%, HS graduate 11.2%, some college 12.9%, college graduate 10.1%, and postgraduate 32%. Health insurance was Medicaid 47.8% and commercial 52.2%. Area of residence was urban 77.1% and suburban 22.9%. The frequency of metabolic syndrome was 42.4%, and was increased in Hispanic women (63.3%) versus NHW (29.6%), women with <HS (72.6%) versus postgraduate education (32.1%), women with Medicaid (57.9% vs. 27.4%) and urban residence (47.5% vs. 27.2%). For all comparisons, P < 0.05. Education <HS was linked to increased risk of metabolic syndrome (odds ratio [OR] = 3.5 [1.2-10.0], P = 0.02). Hispanic women had the lowest level of education (P < 0.001) and the highest frequency of individual metabolic syndrome components (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic syndrome showed an alarming rate in less educated Caribbean Hispanic women and was independently associated with lower education level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.200

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMetabolic Syndrome and Related DisordersSame topicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsFrench-language works237,207