Bibliographic record
Abstract
En renouant les fils de l'histoire, l'autrice situe l'origine de la tradition de l'enseignement technique masculin en Belgique, dans l'enseignement industriel du XIXe siècle et sa figure emblématique de l'ouvrier-technicien. Elle montre comment, durant l'entre-deux-guerres, cette tradition donne sa cohérence éducative et structurelle à une filière unifiée d'enseignement technique de jour. Après 1945, la Belgique, comme d'autres pays européens, a mis en chantier un enseignement secondaire intégré au sein duquel, progressivement, l'identité positive forte issue de la tradition de l'enseignement technique masculin s'est en quelque sorte dissoute. La perspective sociohistorique qui guide l'article enrichit notre compréhension du terreau structurel et culturel dans lequel prennent racine les différents projets élaborés au fil du temps pour l'enseignement technique et professionnel. Finalement, nous sommes conduits à nous interroger au sujet des figures emblématiques et des valeurs porteuses pour l'avenir de cet enseignement, en quête d'une nouvelle identité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".