MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010711203 · doi:10.1080/10420940.2011.601373

Prod Traces (<i>Selenichnites</i>) from the Middle Cambrian of Morocco, with Hypotheses on the Ethology of the Tracemaker(s)

2011· article· en· W2010711203 on OpenAlexafffund
Stacey Gibb, Brian D. E. Chatterton, S. George Pemberton

Bibliographic record

VenueIchnos/Ichnos : an international journal for plant and animal traces · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTrace fossilTrilobitePaleontologyEthologyGeologyBeddingFaunaSiliciclasticBedClastic rockRipple marksArchaeologyGeographyFaciesEcologyPower (physics)OrdovicianSedimentary rockBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A single bedding surface was identified along the roadside close to an important road junction at Tansikht and north of Zagora in southern Morocco. This bedding plane has concomitant interference ripples and distinct horseshoe shaped concave epirelief ichnofossils dispersed across the surface. The sandstone bed belongs to the upper middle Cambrian Azlag Formation. The Azlag Formation occurs above the Bailiella Formation, with its distinctive trilobite fauna, in this section. The traces provide evidence of the ethology of an organism that was inhabiting the shallow waters during this time. Body fossils are rarely preserved in a clastic setting. The traces, assigned to the ichnogenus Selenichnites, and the new ichnospecies, Selenichnites tesiltus, are proposed, identified, diagnosed, described and illustrated herein. Possible tracemakers and behaviors are considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIchnos/Ichnos : an international journal for plant and animal tracesSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207