Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article vise à éclairer certains aspects d’une des dimensions importantes de l’oeuvre de Pascal Quignard, une dimension qui a trait au temps et qui innerve l’ensemble de ses écrits dès la rédaction de ses Petits traités (1977). Plus précisément, au cours de cette étude, on envisage de saisir comment l’écrivain français construit une modalité temporelle qui fraye avec la question de la contemporanéité : le Jadis. La construction de ce temps contemporain à la fois plus actuel et plus originaire que le présent apparaîtra comme un processus de figuration qui fait éclater le continuum de la temporalité ; comme ce qui détermine une poétique du temps d’une portée aporétique se défiant du tribunal de l’histoire. En appui à cette réflexion, on se propose d’analyser comment s’inscrit cette modalité temporelle dans un texte fictionnel, à savoir le conte qui clôt l’ouvrage Sur le Jadis (2002).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".