MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010716536 · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3182412841

Local Hemodynamic Effects of Radiation on the Rabbit Orbitozygomatic Complex with and without Cytoprotection

2012· article· en· W2010716536 on OpenAlexaff
Giorgio C. La Scala, David O’Donovan, Ivan Yeung, Iona Leong, María Fernanda Mendes, Marianne Rogers, Peter C. Neligan, Cho Y. Pang, Christopher R. Forrest

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOral health in cancer treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmifostineMedicineBlood flowIrradiationNuclear medicineAnatomyAnesthesiaSurgeryRadiation therapyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The authors have previously demonstrated that radiation-induced craniofacial bone growth inhibition may be ameliorated using the known cytoprotectant amifostine in the infant rabbit orbitozygomatic complex. The authors' hypothesis is that reduction in blood supply plays an important role in inhibiting craniofacial bone growth following radiotherapy and that cytoprotective pretreatment exerts its protective effect by maintaining blood supply. METHODS: Seven-week-old New Zealand male infant rabbits underwent single-dose orthovoltage irradiation to the right orbitozygomatic complex using established protocols: 0 Gy (sham), 35 Gy, and 35 Gy following pretreatment with amifostine (300 mg/kg administered intravenously). Blood flow to the orbitozygomatic complex, orbitozygomatic complex periosteum, masseter, hemimandible, and overlying skin was measured 1, 14, and 63 days after irradiation, using the modified 15-μm radioactive microsphere technique (n = 18 per group, n = 6 per time point). Orbitozygomatic complex bone specimens were harvested for blood vessel morphometry using safranin O stains at days 1 and 100 after irradiation (n = 20 per group, n = 10 per time point). RESULTS: Blood flow to the irradiated orbitozygomatic complex was significantly (p < 0.05) greater 1 day after single-dose orthovoltage irradiation compared with nonirradiated controls. This increase was not observed in the amifostine-pretreated animals and was also not seen 14 and 63 days after irradiation. No histomorphometric vessel changes were detected at any time point after irradiation in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose orthovoltage irradiation results in a temporary elevation in regional blood flow to the orbitozygomatic complex, returning to control levels within 14 days. Although pretreatment with amifostine attenuates this response, radiation-induced craniofacial bone growth inhibition in this model does not appear to be secondary to hemodynamic alterations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive SurgerySame topicOral health in cancer treatmentFrench-language works237,207