MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010735893 · doi:10.3917/riges.293.0013

Les fondements démographiques de la main-d'œuvre québécoise de demain

2004· article· fr· W2010735893 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jacques Légaré

Bibliographic record

VenueGestion · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRetirement, Disability, and Employment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Une vision à long terme des structures démographiques du Québec dévoile le fait que notre société bénéficie actuellement d’une situation exceptionnellement favorable en ce qui a trait à ses niveaux de dépendance démographique. En effet, les personnes âgées de 20 à 64 ans n’ont jamais été aussi nombreuses par rapport aux personnes dites dépendantes, soit les enfants, les adolescents et les personnes âgées. Cette réalité n’en est pas moins un mirage pour l’avenir de la dynamique démographique au Québec. Nous nous dirigeons vers un vieillissement de la main-d’œuvre et vers une forte croissance de la population de retraités. Face au déficit de main-d’œuvre appréhendé, il faut mettre en place dès maintenant des mécanismes de planification des ressources humaines, lesquels permettront de gérer la main-d’œuvre québécoise de demain de façon décente et surtout équitable pour les générations à venir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGestionSame topicRetirement, Disability, and EmploymentFrench-language works237,207