Time-dependent modulation of carotid body afferent activity during and after intermittent hypoxia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ventilatory response to several minutes of hypoxia consists of various time-dependent phenomena, some of which occur during hypoxia (e.g., short-term depression), whereas others appear on return to normoxia (e.g., posthypoxic frequency decline). Additional phenomena can be elicited by acute, intermittent hypoxia (e.g., progressive augmentation, long-term facilitation). Current data suggest that these phenomena originate centrally. We tested the hypothesis that carotid body afferent activity undergoes time-dependent modulation, consistent with a direct role in these ventilatory phenomena. Using an in vitro rat carotid body preparation, we found that 1) afferent activity declined during the first 5 min of severe (40 Torr Po(2)), moderate (60 Torr Po(2)), or mild (80 Torr Po(2)) hypoxia; 2) after return to normoxia (100 Torr Po(2)) and after several minutes of moderate or severe hypoxia, afferent activity was transiently reduced compared with prehypoxic levels; and 3) with successive 5-min bouts of mild, moderate, or severe hypoxia, afferent activity during bouts increased progressively. We call these phenomena sensory hypoxic decline, sensory posthypoxic decline, and sensory progressive augmentation, respectively. These phenomena were stimulus specific: similar phenomena were not seen with 5-min bouts of normoxic hypercapnia (100 Torr Po(2) and 50-60 Torr Pco(2)) or hypoxic hypocapnia (60 Torr Po(2) and 30 Torr Pco(2)). However, bouts of either normoxic hypercapnia or hypocapnic hypoxia resulted in sensory long-term facilitation. We suggest time-dependent carotid body activity acts in parallel with central mechanisms to shape the dynamics of ventilatory responses to respiratory chemostimuli.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".