MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010820449 · doi:10.3149/jmh.0902.144

Perceptions of Male Ideals: The Power of Presentation

2010· article· en· W2010820449 on OpenAlexaff
Louise Wasylkiw, Michael Currie, Reanne E. Meuse, Rachel Pardoe

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Men s Health · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsMount Allison University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)Power (physics)PerceptionPsychologyMedicinePhysicsNeuroscienceSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two studies examined the perceptions that men have of images of male ideals as a function of whether appearance or performance was emphasized. In Study 1 (N = 54 men) male ideals that stressed appearance were rated as more muscular, more masculine and more attractive than male ideals that stressed performance. In Study 2 (N = 62 men) differences in the presentation of male ideals contributed not only to differences in perceptions of physical attributes but also to judgments of personality and behavioural tendencies of male ideals. In addition to discussing the implications and limitations of the current investigation, avenues for future research are outlined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.399 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Men s HealthSame topicEating Disorders and BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207