Turbulent flow field in a scour hole at a semicircular abutment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The three-dimensional turbulent flow field in a scour hole at a semicircular abutment under a clear water regime was experimentally measured in a laboratory flume using an acoustic Doppler velocimeter. The distributions of time-averaged velocity components, turbulent intensity components, turbulent kinetic energy, and Reynolds stresses at different azimuthal planes are presented. Upstream, presentation of flow field through vector plots at azimuthal and horizontal planes shows the existence of a large primary vortex associated with the downflow inside the scour hole. On the other hand, downstream, the flow field is irregular. The bed shear stresses are determined from the Reynolds stresses and velocity gradients. The data presented in this paper would be useful for the development and validation of flow field models, which can be used to determine the strength of the primary vortex that is used to estimate scour depth at bridge abutments.Key words: bridge abutments, fluid flow, three-dimensional flow, turbulent flow, open channel flow, scour, sediment transport, hydraulic engineering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".