MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010835353 · doi:10.1364/oe.18.012824

Moment-based estimation for the shape parameters of the Gamma-Gamma atmospheric turbulence model

2010· article· en· W2010835353 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGamma distributionGeneralized gamma distributionTurbulenceRange (aeronautics)Estimation theoryPhysicsOpticsInverse-gamma distributionGamma correctionMoment (physics)Free-space optical communicationStatistical physicsAlgorithmAtmospheric turbulenceComputer scienceComputational physicsOptical communicationMathematicsProbability distributionArtificial intelligenceStatisticsClassical mechanicsMechanicsImage (mathematics)Materials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the parameter estimation problem for the Gamma-Gamma turbulence model for free-space optical communication. An estimation scheme for the shape parameters of the Gamma-Gamma distribution is proposed based on the concept of fractional moments and convex optimization. To improve the estimation performance, we further propose a modified scheme which exploits the relationship between the Gamma-Gamma shape parameters in free-space optical communication. Simulation results reveal that the modified estimation scheme can achieve satisfactory performance for a wide range of turbulence conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it