MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010835353 · doi:10.1364/oe.18.012824

Moment-based estimation for the shape parameters of the Gamma-Gamma atmospheric turbulence model

2010· article· en· W2010835353 on OpenAlexaff
Ning Wang, Julian Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGamma distributionGeneralized gamma distributionTurbulenceRange (aeronautics)Estimation theoryPhysicsOpticsInverse-gamma distributionGamma correctionMoment (physics)Free-space optical communicationStatistical physicsAlgorithmAtmospheric turbulenceComputer scienceComputational physicsOptical communicationMathematicsProbability distributionArtificial intelligenceStatisticsClassical mechanicsMechanicsImage (mathematics)Materials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the parameter estimation problem for the Gamma-Gamma turbulence model for free-space optical communication. An estimation scheme for the shape parameters of the Gamma-Gamma distribution is proposed based on the concept of fractional moments and convex optimization. To improve the estimation performance, we further propose a modified scheme which exploits the relationship between the Gamma-Gamma shape parameters in free-space optical communication. Simulation results reveal that the modified estimation scheme can achieve satisfactory performance for a wide range of turbulence conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations95
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ExpressSame topicOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207