The northern ice cap of Mars: an enigmatic evolution compared to the polar environment on Earth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Would it be possible to interpret the dynamics of the northern polar ice cap of Mars with the same criteria as for terrestrial ice sheets? The aim of this paper is to illustrate the problems posed by such an approach. We present a detailed study of the MOC narrow angle image E01-01773, taken at 83.5°N/241.4°W in the upper part of a 300 km-long depression situated at the edge of the northern polar ice cap. On Mars, every depression resembling a valley is a “chasma”, and as this one has no official name, we suggest to call it “West Olympia Chasma” (WOC). By analyzing the satellite image, we have been able to highlight some unusual features of martian glacial geomorphology and to compare them with topographies and sediments known in terrestrial glacial environments. In particular: – the scarp cutting the edge of the ice cap above the chasma is formed of thin alternations of ice and aerosols and is bordered by numerous small and dissymetrical ridges that run parallel to it. On Earth, these ridges would be interpreted as a succession of terminal moraines; in fact, they consist of gravitational debris accumulated under the nearly motionless ice cliff; – at the edge of the ice, where signs of melt water action would be clearly visible in terrestrial environments, there is practically no evidence of such a process on Mars. However, two intriguing channels, several tens of meters wide and about 1 km-long, suggest the occurrence of temporary water flow; – these channels originate at the base of an ice tongue that appears to have flowed recently over the scarp towards the floor of the chasma, in the same manner as surging glaciers on Earth, whereas Mars ice seems motionless; – the sandy sediments covered by the ice cap do not seem to be ground moraines, as would be the case on Earth, but eolian sand brought by winds when the ice cap did not exist. At present, the most effective erosion agents are the winds channelled into the chasma and the alternations of condensation/sublimation. Their combined action explains the dissymetry between both sides of the chasma. The winds are enhanced by local topography and contribute to the movement of dunes towards the outlet of the chasma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".