MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The End of Design and the Architectural Final Project

2011· article· en· W2010853694 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Jemtrud

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Architectural Education · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArchitecture and Computational Design
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsArchitectural engineeringSociologyPower (physics)TechnicianAestheticsEngineeringPolitical scienceLawArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Design is the dominant model of operating upon the world. Few human and non-human spheres remain untouched by its marvelous and terrifying power to reshape the world in which we live. From cities to embryos, everything depends on design. Given its ubiquity, the question of design becomes an ontological matter, despite its outward appearance as a technician's game. The very act of designing gathers a complex network of relations that includes the technical and productive realms but moves outside those concerns to envelop the political, social, spiritual, and material, as well as the everyday.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0190.024
Scholarly communication0.0260.006
Open science0.0020.019
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Architectural EducationSame topicArchitecture and Computational DesignFrench-language works237,207