The Interactive Effects of Exercise and Feeding on Oxygen Uptake, Activity Levels, and Gastric Processing in the Graceful Crab<i>Cancer gracilis</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Exercise and digestive processes are known to elevate the metabolic rate of organisms independently. In this study, the effects of simultaneous exercise and digestion were examined in the graceful crab Cancer gracilis. This species exhibited resting oxygen uptake levels between 29 and 42 mg O(2) kg(-1) h(-1). In postprandial crabs, oxygen uptake was approximately double that of unfed crabs. During exercise, oxygen uptake increased three- to fourfold, reaching maximal levels of more than 130 mg O(2) kg(-1 ) h(-1). However, there was no difference in oxygen uptake during activity between unfed and postprandial animals. There was also no difference in exercise endurance levels between unfed and postprandial animals; both sets of animals were unable to right themselves after being turned on their backs, reaching exhaustion after 13-15 attempts. To determine whether increased activity affected gastric processes, the passage of a meal through the digestive system was followed using a fluoroscope. Passage of digesta through the gut system was slower in active animals than in resting crabs. Resting crabs cleared the foregut after approximately 18 h, which was significantly faster than the 34.5 h for constantly active animals. Likewise, the midgut region of resting animals was cleared at a faster rate than that of active animals. Because of residual amounts of digesta remaining in the hindgut, no difference in clearance rates of this section of the gut was evident. The slower clearance times of the foregut were due to a significantly slower rate of mastication of food, as evidenced by a lower cardiac stomach contraction rate. Contraction of the pyloric region of the foregut functions to move the digesta along the midgut, and there was a direct correlation between slower contraction rates of this region and the increased time of passage for digesta through the midgut of active animals. Because increased activity levels affected gastric processing, the crabs exhibited a behavioral response. During a 24-h period after feeding, there was a significant reduction in locomotor activity. The findings of this study suggest a prioritization of metabolic responses toward activity at the expense of digestion. This is discussed in relation to the ability of the crabs to balance the demands of competing physiological systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".