MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010888158 · doi:10.1149/1.1569477

Anomalous, High-Voltage Irreversible Capacity in Tin Electrodes for Lithium Batteries

2003· article· en· W2010888158 on OpenAlexafffund
S. D. Beattie, T. D. Hatchard, Arman Bonakdarpour, K. C. Hewitt, J. R. Dahn

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDalhousie University
KeywordsElectrodeLithium (medication)ElectrochemistryVoltageCutoffTinMaterials scienceCell voltageHigh voltagePlateau (mathematics)AlloyChemistryComposite materialElectrical engineeringElectrolyteMetallurgyPhysicsMathematicsPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anomalous, high-voltage irreversible capacity is observed in electrodeposited and sputtered Sn films when used as working electrodes in electrochemical lithium cells. Sn electrodes can function as expected in Li/Sn cells provided the upper cutoff potential, while removing lithium from the Sn electrode, is kept below about 1.4 V. However, when the upper cutoff potential is increased to about 1.5 V and above, an anomalous irreversible high-voltage plateau in the voltage-capacity curve is often observed during subsequent lithiation. We discuss the relationship between the recharge cutoff voltage and the presence of anomalous high-voltage irreversible capacity. The dependence of the amount of anomalous, high-voltage irreversible capacity vs. discharge rate of the cell is investigated. A model is proposed to explain the anomalous high-voltage irreversible capacity, including strategies to avoid it. One of the strategies is to alloy Sn with Cu. © 2003 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.517

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations101
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207