Characterization of a complex Duchenne muscular dystrophy-causing dystrophin gene inversion and restoration of the reading frame by induced exon skipping
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Out of three mutations in the dystrophin gene that cause Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), the most common, serious childhood muscle wasting disease, two are genomic deletions of one or more exons that disrupt the reading frame. Specific removal of an exon flanking a genomic deletion using antisense oligonucleotide intervention during pre-RNA processing can restore the reading frame and could potentially reduce disease severity. We describe a rare dystrophin gene rearrangement; inversion of approximately 28 kb, flanked by a 10-bp duplication and an 11-kb deletion, which led to the omission of exons 49 and 50 from the mature mRNA and the variable inclusion of several pseudoexons. In vitro transfection of cultured patient cells with antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 51 induced efficient removal of that exon, as well as one of the more commonly included pseudoexons, suggesting closely coordinated splicing of these exons. Surprisingly, several antisense oligonucleotides (AOs) directed at this pseudoexon had no detectable effect on the splicing pattern, while all AOs directed at the other predominant pseudoexon efficiently excised that target. Antisense oligomers targeting dystrophin exon 51 for removal are currently undergoing clinical trials. Despite the unique nature of the dystrophin gene rearrangement described here, a personalized multiexon skipping treatment is applicable and includes one compound entering clinical trials for DMD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".