Évolution de l'assimilation linguistique au Québec et au Canada entre 1971 et 1991
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À la lumière du lien entre l'assimilation linguistique et la crise de l'unité canadienne, nous examinons, au moyen des données de recensements, les tendances de l'assimilation des allophones au Québec et des minorités francophones dans les autres provinces. Il en ressort une francisation relative des immigrants récents au Québec, attribuable à une immigration accrue en provenance de pays de langue latine ou de la francophonie et, dans une moindre mesure, à la scolarisation obligatoire en français prévue par les lois 22 et 101. En revanche, l'anglicisation est plus forte qu'en 1971 parmi les immigrés établis depuis plus longtemps et les allophones nés au Québec. Ailleurs au Canada, l'anglicisation des francophones est partout à la hausse sauf, peut-être, au Nouveau-Brunswick. Les tendances défavorables au français appellent une révision majeure de la politique canadienne en ce qui concerne la langue, la culture et la nationalité du Canada français.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".