MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010936739 · doi:10.1684/ipe.2011.0811

À propos d'une approche médicojudiciaire des auteurs de violences intrafamiliales : l'expérience douaisienne

2011· article· fr· W2010936739 on OpenAlex
Pierre Le Runigo, Benoît Laurie, Caroline Allouchery, Guillaume Cnudde, Jacques Louvrier

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueL information psychiatrique · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La politique de la juridiction de Douai, sous l’impulsion du procureur Luc Fremiot, s’est construite entre 2003 et 2008 en associant une prise en compte judiciaire tres precoce des phenomenes de violence dans la famille et une prise en charge therapeutique intensive de l’auteur. Nous assurons depuis 2008 cette prise en charge, qui s’appuie sur des groupes hebdomadaires, co-animes par deux therapeutes, se deroulant sur un minimum de 21 seances. La methodologie des groupes est partagee avec les equipes d’Option au Quebec, precurseurs en la matiere, et Praxis, qui intervient sur l’ensemble de la Wallonie. Plus de 400 personnes ont ete suivies depuis trois ans. Le cadre general est celui d’un reseau sante-justice solide et fortement structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it