MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010952939 · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.12.3024

The American Cancer Society, American Diabetes Association, and American Heart Association Joint Statement on Preventing Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, and Diabetes

2004· letter· en· W2010952939 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander M. Clark, Kim D. Raine, Dennis Raphael

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Care · 2004
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicObesity and Health Practices
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetes mellitusAssociation (psychology)CancerDiseaseStatement (logic)Internal medicineGerontologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By focusing on shared causes of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer, the recent joint statement (1) from the American Diabetes Association, American Cancer Society, and American Heart Association is to be welcomed. However, while the statement draws attention to the importance of influencing lifestyle behaviors, treatments, health systems, and the law, these diseases also share social causes that the statement does not address or acknowledge. The social determinants …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes CareSame topicObesity and Health PracticesFrench-language works237,207