MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010972644 · doi:10.1002/nla.701

A simultaneous decomposition of a matrix triplet with applications

2010· article· en· W2010972644 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNumerical Linear Algebra with Applications · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersShanghai Municipal Education CommissionMcGill UniversityNatural Science Foundation of Shanghai
KeywordsHermitian matrixMathematicsMatrix (chemical analysis)DecompositionMatrix functionMatrix decompositionPure mathematicsApplied mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldSymmetric matrixEigenvalues and eigenvectorsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Researches on ranks of matrix expressions have posed a number of challenging questions, one of which is concerned with simultaneous decompositions of several given matrices. In this paper, we construct a simultaneous decomposition to a matrix triplet (A, B, C), where A=±A*. Through the simultaneous matrix decomposition, we derive a canonical form for the matrix expressions A−BXB*−CYC* and then solve two conjectures on the maximal and minimal possible ranks of A−BXB*−CYC* with respect to X=±X* and Y=±Y*. As an application, we derive a sufficient and necessary condition for the matrix equation BXB* + CYC*=A to have a pair of Hermitian solutions, and then give the general Hermitian solutions to the matrix equation. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score0.634

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it