MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010978016 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2012.0015

"Not a limitless possession": Health Advice and Readers' Agency in The Girl's Own Paper , 1880-1890

2012· article· en· W2010978016 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cynthia Ellen Patton

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian periodicals review · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGirlViewpointsAgency (philosophy)Possession (linguistics)Advice (programming)Medical advicePsychologySociologyArtDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatrySocial scienceVisual artsComputer sciencePhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the first ten years of its publication, the "Answers to Correspondents" column of The Girl's Own Paper frequently included advice and information about medical subjects. Despite prevailing cultural attitudes and medical opinions that constructed women as existing in a helplessly and permanently compromised state of health, the Girl's Own Paper 's correspondence columns generally offered a more optimistic sense of the possibility of good health and of readers' ability to take control of their own health. The tensions between these two constructions of women's health are never fully resolved, however, as the Girl's Own Paper 's advice to its readers wavers between conventional and progressive viewpoints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.016
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian periodicals reviewSame topicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesFrench-language works237,207