MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2010985927 · doi:10.1021/ma991924d

An Improved Mimetic Compound for Styrene “Living” Free Radical Polymerization. An Initiator Containing the “Penultimate” Unit

2000· article· en· W2010985927 on OpenAlexaff
W. G. Skene, J. C. Scaiano, Glenn P. A. Yap

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryDisproportionationRadical polymerizationPolymer chemistryRadicalCobalt-mediated radical polymerizationRadical disproportionationMonomerStyrenePolymerizationMoietyRadical initiatorPhotochemistryLiving free-radical polymerizationBulk polymerizationPolymerCopolymerOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new thermal initiator for living free radical polymerization (LFRP) has been synthesized photochemically by coupling of the free radical TEMPO with the 1,3-diphenyl-1-propyl radical. This initiator ( 4 ), which contains the penultimate monomer unit, is a much better mimetic compound than similar compounds derived from radicals with a single styrene moiety, such as the 1-phenylethyl radical (which yields adduct 2 ). In particular, 4 does not yield any disproportionation products, while other model compounds usually do. This is attributed to the lowest energy conformation of 4, which places the β-hydrogen atoms in an unfavorable stereoelectronic arrangement to give disproportionation products. It is anticipated that the same situation will prevail in the polymer, and it is instrumental in determining the low polydispersities achievable with LFRP. This report includes a detailed study of the properties of 4, including its thermal decomposition and relevant free radical kinetics, as well as a comparison of the rotational barrier of 4 with that of 2 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207