MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Anterior Intramuscular Transposition With Ulnar Nerve Decompression at the Elbow

2001· article· en· W2010992094 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Nerve Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryNeurolysisElbowUlnar nerveDecompressionCubital tunnel syndromeCubital tunnelUlnar neuropathyTransposition (logic)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effectiveness of decompression and anterior intramuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for treatment of severe cubital tunnel syndrome was evaluated. A consecutive series of 39 anterior intramuscular transpositions were reviewed. One surgeon performed the transpositions between 1993 and 1997 in 34 patients who presented with clinically severe cubital tunnel syndrome. Clinical outcome and satisfaction with surgery were assessed. The results showed early clinical improvement of 77% of patients (mean followup, 3.34 months). With repeated assessments later, the same group of patients had clinical improvement of 62% (mean followup, 30.9 months). Patients younger than 50 years, individuals who underwent external neurolysis, or patients who had a previously failed subcutaneous transposition had fewer satisfactory results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.730

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it