MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011010787 · doi:10.1109/esscirc.2010.5619723

A reconfigurable 10–12b 0.4–44MS/s pipelined ADC with 0.35–0.5pJ/step in 1.2V 90nm digital CMOS

2010· article· en· W2011010787 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Taherzadeh‐Sani, Anas A. Hamoui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReconfigurabilityCMOSComputer scienceUpgradeElectronic engineeringFlash ADCElectrical engineeringComparatorCapacitorScalabilityVoltageEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This pipelined ADC is reconfigurable over sampling frequencies of 0.4-44 MS/s and resolutions of 10-12 bits, thus targeting multi-standard wireless terminals. Fabricated in 1.2-V 90-nm digital CMOS, it achieves a competitive FOM of 0.35-0.5 pJ/conversion step over its wide reconfigurability space. For power scalability, the ADC bandwidth and resolution are reconfigured using current-scaling and stage-bypass methods, respectively. The following techniques are also introduced to achieve this low-power performance for the ADC over its wide reconfigurability space, and to enable its implementation in low-voltage nanometer CMOS: 1) pseudo-cascode compensation for the low-power design of low-voltage current-scalable opamps; 2) design of switched-capacitor dynamic comparators with low input loading; 3) low-power digital background gain calibration to enable designing the ADC using low-gain/low-power opamps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207