MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2011013292 · doi:10.7202/1018861ar

La trame augustinienne dans Qu’est-ce que la religion ? de Keiji Nishitani

2013· article· fr· W2011013292 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vincent Giraud

Bibliographic record

VenueThéologiques · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nishitani Keiji (1900-1990) a mis en oeuvre une reprise féconde des questions propres à la tradition métaphysique occidentale en prenant appui sur la conception bouddhiste de la vacuité (japonais : kū ; sanscrit : śūnyatā ) . Marchant sur les traces d’Augustin et de sa pensée de la conversion, il a lié aussi étroitement que possible pensée philosophique et quête religieuse. Le nouvel édifice conceptuel élaboré par Nishitani autour de la notion de śūnyatā ne prend en effet tout son sens que pour qui se rend capable d’une conversion au sens religieux du terme, décentrement radical de sa propre existence en direction de la vacuité, et permettant seul un accès véritable à l’être. La saisie par Nishitani de l’essence de la religion le conduit ainsi dans les parages de l’augustinisme, éclairant d’un jour nouveau le possible usage contemporain des catégories bouddhistes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.433
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThéologiquesSame topicPolitical and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207